What Matters Now
CME
Real-World Decisions in R/R B-Cell Lymphoma

Joshua Brody, M.D., Mount Sinai

Manik Uppal, M.D., Mount Sinai
81% of Peers Changed Their Practice After this Clinical Scenario
CME
Aligning later-line treatment for relapsed follicular lymphoma with efficacy, safety, and patient lifestyle impact.
What Matters Now
CME
Real-World Decisions in R/R B-Cell Lymphoma

Joshua Brody, M.D., Mount Sinai

Manik Uppal, M.D., Mount Sinai
Corresponding Scenario
Later-Line FL: Aligning Treatment Tradeoffs With Patient Priorities
See experiences from 38 peers
Aligning later-line treatment for relapsed follicular lymphoma with efficacy, safety, and patient lifestyle impact.
How clinicians responded after this Clinical Scenario
82
%
begin unsure how to apply evidence
81
%
will implement a practice change
NEW!
Sharpen your clinical judgment for real-world care.
Discover how experts and peers reason
See where small differences in reasoning change safety, feasibility, and escalation decisions.
Reflect on your decision logic
Practice the thinking you used and spot gaps in judgment.
Calibrate your clinical reasoning
Side-by-side, reasoning patterns from peer and experts and how others de-risk their decisions.
Preview
Example: How Your Clinical Reasoning Compares with Peers

This table shows a representative example. Your actual peer comparison is generated after scenario completion.
CME Information
Program title: Evidence and Insight for Real-World Care in R/R B-cell Lymphomas
Jointly provided by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and StitchedHealth, Inc.
Release date: March 17, 2026
Expiration date: March 17, 2027
Estimated time to complete activity: 15 min to 2 hours hours
This activity is supported by an independent educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Target Audience
This activity is intended for hematology and medical oncology physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants involved in the care of patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas.
Get Started
Ready to refine your clinical judgment for everyday practice?
In a short (10 min) interactive scenario, explore how experts and peers reason through uncertainty and apply evidence in real-world care.
81% practice change rate among peers